![]() In addition, a motion in limine and the corresponding ruling may provide a cleaner record on appeal. Some purposes of deciding such issues in limine are to provide certainty prior to the trial as well as to avoid interrupting the trial with argument on matters that could have been definitively addressed beforehand. Motions in limine can run the gamut from simple to complex. Generally speaking, in limine motions are used as vehicles for litigants to obtain pretrial rulings on evidentiary and related matters, such as the admissibility of particular evidence, burdens of proof, the exclusion of witness testimony (including expert testimony), evidentiary exclusions consistent with a prior summary judgment ruling, and excluding witnesses from the courtroom during certain times. Because this practice stems from the courts’ inherent management authority, motions in limine could be submitted far in advance of trial (such as with a summary judgment motion) or during the trial. ![]() ![]() Rather, motions in limine and the courts’ resolution of those motions prior to trial have developed under the courts’ inherent authority to manage trials and dockets. There is no explicit rule under the Federal Rules of Evidence or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that authorize in limine rulings. Depending on local practice and the presiding judge, the governing schedule order may provide parties with dates by which motions in limine are to be filed and a hearing date for those motions. In limine is Latin for “at the outset” or “at the start.” Motions in limine are commonplace in federal (and state) civil litigation and are generally filed prior to the commencement of a trial. Motions In Limine: A Vehicle for Evidentiary Rulings in Advance of Trial
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |